Wwi Wwii
Legal adulterers, belief systems and Crescentologism: the case of Muslims
Hasan A. Yahya, Professor of Philosophy
Belief, true or false, is a power by itself. In Islam, belief in the Koran and Hadith of the Prophet [true (Sahih) or sacrid-Qudsi (for God through his tongue Muhammad) and the false [Maudu ')] is a power.]] If it was believed by Muslims. In Christianity, the belief that Jesus' sacrifice to save his disciples [true or false], or as the Son of God [[true or false]] is a power too. The same, just as the belief among Jews [as the chosen people true or false]] is a power.
According Crescentologism, true knowledge, [not fake or false knowledge] to be potency, to understand each other, to enjoy, and to compromise. Therefore, these beliefs should not be touched, except those who wonder these beliefs are under attack the faithful to these beliefs. These attacks take the form of murder or murder or bombings, or the payment of ransom to kill them. They are called blasphemous and heretical. According Crescentology, beliefs keep people out of the debate, to obtain TRUE better] understanding [deals with the logic and reasoning in business worlds. In other words, the belief is the truth about Crescentology the moon, which is a natural phenomenon, where both sides of the crescent [Disappearance and the sides shown] exist as the full moon.
Take advantage as a Muslim, Jew or Christian, or any other ideology such as communism, Nazism, Capitalism, globalism or (as understood by the dominant powers), remains human mentality and reasoning to deal with the dispute or conflict, and makes people close to the animals who have physical and material needs, and use their power to meet their needs.
To get rid of this power religious or spiritual [true or false] Crescentology approach is to follow, where the two fighting beliefs may be dismissed in emotional processing with the search for truth conflicts concerning individuals (husband and wife) or two people or two nations, or two regions or unions [like communism, capitalism, NATO and non-NATO forces, the EU and non EU, East-West-Western Orientalists, etc.
To prove the power of belief [True or False], among Christians, Muslims, Jews, capitalism, communism, etc, you can see the [existing hatred or less opposition in the theory and practice that can lead to trigger war or act of terrorism like 9 / 11] of them that was promoted by [true or false ideological beliefs]. For example, the revolution the proletariat in Marxist communism against the capitalist system, the crusades to save the land of Jesus of Arab and Muslim infidels Occupation Jewish Palestine and the Palestinian Arab resistance; Nazis to purify the Aryan race of white Jews and others, The Turks and Armenians, Arabs and Kurds, the rich and the poor Hindus and Muslims, fundamentalism (or conservatism or liberalism) in the same system. All these ideologies encouraging hatred and hostility of the supporters of each of which provides such objections, without reasoning and without considering the idea of Crescentologism, where the other have the same rules of faith.
On the home front, take for example the marriage contract, which pays for legal prostitution a woman to have sex with a man, and of course cheaper than illegal prostitution. What is a contract mean? In politics, marriage, in a case. It is a contract between two parties. If contracts have been violated by opposition, or cheating [in marriage] or by using force [In times of war or terrorism], the contracts are canceled. Any denial of contract when he performed a disagreement over contracts are illegal. Anarchy and chaos of business, but the legal culture in marriages.
In marriage, the market works to meet human needs (Male) is not the woman (female). This is a contract for obedience. For stripping the rights of women. The man [men] or woman [wife] or a party [More power physical, emotional or spiritual] same-sex partners have the right to deviate from the contract. Some cultures dominated by men call manhood, what man is, is not the same as women. Theological interpretations and apologist sometimes lead to misunderstandings.
In the Muslim world, there are many traditions undermine women's rights and position in the structure social. For example, in a tradition, the Sunna (what is said about the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him-as) if a man sleeps with his wife in anger [His wife], the woman is doomed to go to hell. In other words, if he wanted to have sex with her, and she refused for some reason, God itself will be angry too. Thus, women are banned from heaven for that sin. This is for many intellectuals is absurd. Muhammad pbuh-, do not say such a ridiculous statement because he is wise as a prophet is not discriminatory. Because Adam and Eve completely Iblis (Satan) has left the sky. In the reasoning I could say, Arabs and Muslims to believe strongly and can tell. But the Prophet Muhammad you no discrimination. It is not practiced religious truth about men and women as equal, but faith that encourage cultural discrimination and prejudice.
Why? Take for example another saying widely circulated among Muslims as Sunnis and Shiites, which is not true that Muhammad pbuh said. "Most women he said: "I saw were people of Hell."
Taking into account that the Prophet sometimes by Aisha wakes One night, she found the Prophet-peace be upon him crying when she asked him, he said: "I'm not sure God will be pleased with me, so I'm not sure that God will send me to heaven. If the Prophet himself did not know that it will be sent to heaven or hell without God's will, how can he say that most women will be in Hell. Logically they say reflects a misunderstanding or false, and therefore "Maudu" or falsification.
To authenticate what I said the full hadith says (in Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, Number 28)
"Ibn Abbas': The Prophet said: "I was shown the Hell-fire and that the majority of its inhabitants were women who were ungrateful." He was asked, " Do they disbelieve in Allah? "Or are they ungrateful to Allah? He replied:" They are ungrateful to their husbands and are ungrateful for the blessings and the good (charitable deeds) done to them. If you've always been good (benevolent) to one of them, then she sees something in you (not his taste), she will say: "I have never received good to see you."
Some Muslim scholars do not reject this hadith, but he justifies " even if we take the hadith in its literal sense, it's really a problem? They say: "Since we're all supposed to try to reach the paradise anyway, we should rejoice in the hadith as advice on how not to act. "But what the majority means? What" They " mean? And who is the minority in heaven, then?
Taking the Hadith is that justifies that "The Prophet, peace be upon him, may have seen some behavior women in her community. By love and concern, he warned that such conduct would lead to hell rather than heaven. This hadith is for tell us how serious ingratitude. And it's a warning for both sexes. "But culturally understanding of the Hadith, and distribute it as fair both sexes, is misleading, taking it literally, without using "MAY".
Women in almost all societies tolerate injustices of their husbands throughout their lives. 99% of women are treated like servants. They must comply with the wishes of their husbands sexual desires. However, a Muslim does not give women the right to complain or react against the injustice of their husbands, or to show the same attitude to the bad husband as shown. If a woman does any of this, then hellfire is his fate!
Islam does not say that. Men and women are equal, "said Islam, except seventeen qualities in terms of their physical flesh mentioned by al-Ghazali nine centuries ago. These natural differences are mixed with religious beliefs, as if they were dictated by God. Then God said: "O mankind We created you from a single (pair) of men and women, [Adam and Eve] and you made into nations and tribes so that you may know and cooperate with them. "(Quran 49:13) God in this verse does not discriminate between men and women. But cultures do. [Media The two statements are understood by people as they professed theologian by Muslim scholars, and not what they wanted mean by God. Because some Ayat, verses, have two meanings, one Zahir, of course, and the other is Batin, secret, nobody knows the meaning of it in Islam, except the few people who have knowledge of the prophets or messengers of God God] also says in the Hadith Qudsi.:
"I'm like my servant thinks I am. I am with him when he makes mention of Me. [Glorified Allah said, al-Hamdu lillah example] If it makes mention of Me to himself [The Hawla wala quwwata Illa Billah lillah Inn-wa Inna lahu Raji'un] for example, I talk to him myself [if his name is Hasan, God will do the same, I say Allah Subhan Allah or God says Hasan, Hasan Subhan] and he makes mention of Me in an assembly, [for example in a mosque where al-Salatu Jama 'ah, the prayer group for example [I mention him in an assembly better than it [may be God, the assembly of angels, or believers in his presence, he has chosen, for example]. And if he comes near me at arm's length, I approach him in a brews [eg, raising hands to ask for my help, I'm closer to him]. And if he comes to Me walking, [the mosque, for example] I go to him at the speed [I'll send it to respond more quickly than it].
Commenting on the Hadith, Where is God all Israel for example, is in the Middle East what the imitators of God hates. What is God? Where is he or she, when Israel destroyed Lebanon and Gaza? In War World and Second World War and other historical events? Where he / she was it? When S did he go? Certainly, as the Hadith Qudsi he support of believers, God is their ears, their eyes, their hands and feet. Israel, according to this Hadith, then that is his people not Muslims, because that Muslims had fled, and God was with them too fleeing by the Hadith Qudsi.
My point here is not to falsify the hadith, or that God has nothing to do with what happens on earth, simply because there is no justice on earth. If God existed on earth to take care of his people, Israel will not defeat the people of God. America will not destroy Heroshima, and had the victory. Otherwise, God will have two sides, which denies the essence of Islam and the oneness of God, and prove the idea of two gods.
Another Hadith of Bukhari terrorism [On the thought, the two brackets added by the author of this article] said: "Whosoever shows enmity to someone devoted to me, I'll be at war with him [[whose devotees to him.? Not everyone can claim that he / she is devout to Him]] My servant draws not near to Me with anything more loved by Me than the religious duties I have enjoined on him, [[means that God is One, prayer, zakat, sawm, and Haj]] and My servant continues to draw near to Me with supererogatory works so that I love. [[As far as God loves you, for example, and become one with him, with eyes to see, ears to hear, hands to hit, and feet to walk]] When I love him I am his hearing with which he hears, his sight by which he sees, his hand with which he strikes and his foot with which he walks. Were he to ask [something] for me, I would surely give him, [[we are together, if he / she (the devotee) was rejected because he sees, hears, strikes and marches of God eyes, hands, feet, ears and]] Me and him were to seek refuge, I would surely grant him it. [[This is a promise of God, pious people to take care of them]] I hesitate not hesitate to nothing more than [before] the soul of My faithful servant: he hates death and I hate hurting him. (Bukhari)
This Hadith is doubtful if this is not true. Why? If people believe they understand, will be blind if they think they Devotees are people talking about God. They will tell you that we approach God, and God loves us. They will tell you that the love of God considers us his strikes hand with our hands, feet walking with ours, and his eyes is to see things through the eyes. Jihadi Salafi fundamentalists and blindly believe that Hadith as if God has said about the language of Mohammed, peace be upon him. This strengthens their power by claiming that their way is much better than others, so they call themselves, allah Junud, welds of God, or Hezbollah, the Party of God. Muslimen or Ikhwan, the Muslim Brotherhood. Or Army of Muhammad. Whereas others have denied that the mercies of God, which is granted only for them. So they act as small gods terrorize other sections of their own society and other societies in Europe and the United States.
So if people believe they can strike the hand of God, they believe, wrongly, that God is one who is striking with their hands. Their eyes are as if God is to do with their eyes, and if they walk in the way of God, God is walking through their feet. Such an interpretation makes welds of God, or Hezbollah, or Ikhwan Muslimeen, etc., according to cultural beliefs.
This belief is true hadiths as a perception or misinterpretation, the young fools people to follow Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaidah, for example, or suicide bombers, or Ikhwan Muslimen or Hezbollah or Hamas or any other followers system of dogmatic beliefs. The thought of destroying its roots in these traditions if it is interpreted as above. . Because logically, they make no sense if interpreted in the way Muslims interpret it. Unfortunately, this interpretation is widely accepted by the theologian and common Muslims. Therefore, the pursuit of these hadiths as they were interpreted and understood, is to continue terrorist acts against other perceived not acting like the gods according to their interpretations. With the perception that God walks with us, because this we see, and hearing only what we understand, and of course, when we knock, He, God is striking with our hands. Just like the tradition Notice General, said on invisible angels fight side by side with Muslims in the first battle of Badr "This is not that you throw (arrows), God does. "
Is there another interpretation of Muslim jurists (Jurisprudence)? Instead of discuss the issue, one that brings to discussion, is accused of being blasphemous and heretical. It's a big problem in the Muslim world destroys their mentality and fire up their emotions. But how can we prove that some of these very well distributed Ahadith (Sayings) among Muslims are illogical, and should not be interpreted in the way these groups or fundamentalist theologian believe it is true recruit believers in their structures using such sayings. Acting because they become gods walking, seeing, hearing, and suppression. This a dangerous interpretation. I think
Perception of these groups is the danger on the other unbelievers and those of the same society, particularly those who question these illogical or misinterpreted Ahadith (Lyrics).
I am a Muslim by faith, not a theologian, I am more a philosophical approach using the logic of the argument above. And logic means reasoning. These Ahadith unfortunately, are interpreted in favor of some religious leaders to mislead the innocent people who are these Ahadith describe their group of followers, as if they are gods, as Salafists or Wahhabis, or Ikhwan Muslimem, or Hezbollah, or Hamas. And other people are their enemies. Exactly as was the case of the Jews and Palestine, the Nazis and the Jews in Germany or the Cold War or East and West Edward Said's Orientalism, or in some aspects.
Over the past nine centuries, these Ahadith are mentality Muslim, as these hadith Qudsi sometimes called, means that God speaks through the mouth of Muhammad pbuh, are misinterpreted to suit certain cultural interests. So these hadiths are sacred and can not be moved or debated by theologians. Done. And it's a sin to question former interpretation, which could be called by intellectuals Ijtihad, giving decisions according to the situation, time, location, and interest. This is a call for Crescentologism earlier, my upcoming book. (2690 words) www.hasanyahya.com
About the Author
Hasan A. Yahya is an American writer, scholar, and professor of philosophy. Has a 2 Ph.d degrees from MSU. He published 30books (22 Arabic and 8 English), and 200 plus articles on sociology, religion, psychology, politics, poetry, and short stories. Philosophically, his writings concern logic, justice and human rights worldwide. Dr. Yahya is the author of Crescentoly: Theory C. of Conflict Management and Cultural Normalization, 2009, on Amazon. He’s an expert on Arab and Islamic cultures, and was invited to several TV shows and international conferences on religion and future strategic planning. www.dryahyatv.com
